I see the point of both those who agree with the article and those who are bothered by it.
If you read it, the information is accurate and insightful. The author put a lot of research into it and makes good points. I have no issue with the body of the article.
The problem is the title ESPN chose. Instead of "Arizona has potential to be the best team in the country" they title it "Arizona overrated..." For the casual majority of hundreds of thousands of ESPN visitors who don't have insider accounts, the overwhelming conclusion drawn will be that the Wildcats aren't particularly good. The headline essentially serves as a negative campaign against Arizona. This is a shame because the article mostly lauds Arizona as a multi-faceted juggernaut with only one possible chink in the armor--turnovers.
It's a quality article with a terribly misleading title.